Phrikoceros
nocturnus (Newman
& Cannon, 1996)
1st
photo:
Scott Johnson, Puako, Hawai`i. Size: 40mm
2nd
photo:
Scott Johnson, Pupukea, O`ahu. Size: 32mm
3rd photo:
Tina Owens, Kona, Hawai`i.
4th photo:
Leslie Newman & Andrew Flowers, Great Barrier Reef?
ID from Newman & Cannon CD, where this species is listed as Tytthosoceros
nocturnus. However, the genus Tytthosoceros has since been
subsumed under the genus Phrikoceros. On the CD, Scott Johnson's
photo immediately below is primary photo. The original 1996 description
reads: "Velvety black or dark brown (sometimes with a red tinge),
no markings. Pseudotentacles with white or grey tips. ... Raised medially
(not flat)" The pseudotentacles are described as small and
earlike.
Why Newman chose an animal with white spots for the primary photo is
puzzling, as she states that there are "no markings". 2nd
photo (also by Scott Johnson) shows fewer spots; the required pale tentacle
tips are faintly visible at lower right. 3rd photo by Tina Owens has
spots. Bottom photo, by Newman and Flowers, appears on the CD and on
various websites. I include it here to show a specimen with no markings
that conforms more closely to the actual description. Note the small,
forward-pointing pseudotentacles. It is possible that the Hawai`i worms
are actually a closely related species. A photograph
by Erwin Kohler of a worm from the Philippines seems similar to
the Hawai`i worms. Note that the pseudotentacles do not appear particularly
small and earlike.
The all-dark Pseudoceros
cf
bolool is similar but has large triangular pseudotentacles
with no white markings on them. Newman & Cannon write: "...
easily confused with Pseudoceros bolool Newman & Cannon,
1994a which is also evenly black and possesses one male pore. However,
Tytthosoceros nocturnus is raised medially (not flat), has white
tips on its ear-like pseudotentacles." Original 1996 description
of T. nocturnus is here.
BACK to solid colors
|